Did eBay tell the Buyers? Despatch or Delivery Time?Posted 12-Apr-08 06:52:43 BST Updated 01-Sep-08 07:15:36 BST There's no doubt that one of the most controversial topics of the year, on eBay, has been the introduction of using the Detailed Seller Ratings (DSRs) feedback from buyers to determine a seller's visibility in browse & search, and in many cases, the amount of fees they pay to eBay. The controversy is further compounded when you look at what eBay tells buyers, and how that differs from what they tell (and use against) the sellers. When leaving feedback, eBay tells buyers that the DSRs should be rated as follows (please note - descriptions in italics with a question mark are where I've had to guess the description because I cannot find a public statement of the exact wording used. If you have the correct list, please let me know.) -
Part of the problem with those descriptions, as any psychologist will tell you, is that the very nature of people will make them normally opt for the rating that is one less than perfect - there's always room for improvement, right? You would think that a corporation the size of eBay would know and understand that, and make allowances for it, wouldn't you? If you do, you'd be wrong. There have been countless posts in eBay forums and on blog sites off-eBay regarding a new sytem eBay are introducing, that put's eBay's assessment of a seller (based on current DSRs for that seller) right up front in buyers' faces. In some announcements, it's reported that a seller with a DSR of 4.0 or less for one of the four DSR topics will have a big warning at the top of their listings stating, "Warning - this seller has a low rating for (DSR topic)". In other posts, users have witnessed that same warning when the DSR score is 4.5 or less. Why are eBay trying to stop sellers selling? Why are they tainting the seller in the buyers' eyes before a bid is even placed, or the buyer has scrolled down to the item photo and description? eBay UK says that sellers must maintain a minimum 30-day Detailed Seller Rating (DSR) of 4.6 in all four of the DSR categories in order to qualify for the FVF discounts. In the US it is 4.6 for the lower rate of discount and 4.8 for the higher rate of discount. Additionally, any seller with any DSR below 4.3 will be disadvantaged in search and browse - placed at the bottom of the listings returned for buyers to view - and any seller with a DSR below 4.0 will suffer selling restrictions. So, buyers - think about that last paragraph - if you all give all your sellers a 4.0 rating, it is impossible for the sellers to get their well deserved fee discounts from eBay, and they will have visibility restrictions placed on their listings, making it impossible for you to differentiate between good and bad sellers. They will also have selling restrictions imposed meaning less choice on the site, and more chance you will be offered listings from dodgy sellers, because with less than ten DSR ratings per 30 days, those dodgy sellers will not be penalised and will rise to the top of search & browse. Remember also, if you're all happily giving 4.0's, it only takes 1 person to give a 3.0 and your favourite sellers become restricted or even suspended. So be sure to give 5.0's whenever there is no pressing reason to not give it. For sellers, the two most impossible DSR topics to understand are Despatch Time, and Shipping Costs. Part of the reason for this problem is that eBay appears to be playing "Divide & Conquer", both between sites and between buyers and sellers.
You can see that these are clearly different concepts on those 3 sites, and the range of descriptions continues to grow as you explore other eBay sites. In particular, the first of those items, on the UK means the time between receiving payment and sending the goods on their way, on the US means the total delivery time, and on Australia means the time the post office takes to deliver after receiving the package. The second item allows nothing in the description for sellers' handling charges, whereas the US does, but the Australian description implies anything but the post office is not allowed. Why is eBay setting such different connotations for different sites? eBay is supposed to be a single "global marketplace" with a "level playing field" for all buyers and sellers. Clearly they are fragmenting that marketplace and not so much tilting the field, but filling it with craters and rubble heaps. I really cannot understand what they are doing here, but I do know it is seriously affecting my eBay business in terms of gross sales and profitability - for the worse. eBay UK's Help page for DSRs states - Sellers are not responsible for delays in postal services, and should only be rated on aspects of delivery they can control, including handling time. Some sellers specify their handling time in the item description. Also, many sellers wait for the buyer's payment to clear before posting an item. For international transactions, please allow extra time for delivery. Postage & packaging charges may include charges beyond the postage price for the item. Sellers may charge actual packaging materials costs and a reasonable handling fee to cover the seller's time and direct costs associated with delivery. For international transactions, buyers may also be responsible for duties, taxes, and customs clearance fees as requested by country laws. When rating sellers on shipping time, rate the seller on the time it took them to mail the item, not the time it took you to receive the item. You shouldn’t hold sellers responsible for delays in mail services, international custom delays or for the time it took for your payment to clear. When rating the seller on shipping and handling charges, remember that sellers may charge actual packaging materials costs and a reasonable handling fee to cover the seller’s time and direct costs associated with shipping. For international transactions, you may also be responsible for duties, taxes, and customs clearance fees as requested by country laws. Notice how there are subtle but important differences between the guidance given to buyers? Notice also, how the topic names given in the Australian help page don't match the topic names given to buyers when they are leaving feedback for sellers? Is this deliberate, or just an oversight? The concensus amongst sellers is that it's deliberate and intended to confuse buyers so that sellers receive lower DSRs, and thus lose the Seller Performance discounts on Final Value Fees on their invoices - eBay wins, sellers lose, buyers ultimately lose as more sellers leave eBay, taking with them their unique items that made eBay so much fun. In the eBay US online workshop about Seller DSR ratings for Despatch Time & Shipping Costs on 1st Feb 2008 (http://forums.ebay.com/db2/thread.jspa?threadID=2000509099) it was stated, "Detailed Seller Ratings scores (DSRs) will be considered for eligibility for the PowerSeller program, for PowerSeller discounts, and for promotion in Best Match search." and some of the guidance eBay staff offered to sellers included -
Here at GazLanNaThai, we do all of the above and have done so since long before DSRs were even thought of, but our 30-day Despatch Time DSR (the one used to determine our visibility in search & browse, and our FVF discounts on our invoice) has sat at 4.4 since late March 08. Throughout the year, over 95% of our buyers have opted to use the cheaper and slower SAL Economy Airmail postal option. They are therefore choosing to be "cheap Charlies" by paying the minimum possible for delivery, but are then hammering our DSRs for slow delivery, not for slow despatch. Our Shipping Costs DSR is at 4.6, but hang on a minute - we normally offer 3 main shipping services, two of which have the option of upgrading to expedited for less than £1.00 / $2.00, and all our rates include International Registered Delivery. 85%+ of our packages shipped to the UK have a total shipping cost that is less than the UK post office charges for the International Signed For element on it's own - UK sellers cannot compete with us when comparing like for like on international shipping - Thai Post is far, far cheaper than Royal Mail. Looking at the USPS website, USA sellers also cannot come close to our total shipping charges for identical packages, unless they take a loss on the shipping costs. Why then are we marked so low for the shipping costs' DSR? The answer of course is simple - it goes back to those DSR descriptive names, common psychology about room-for-improvement bias, and to lack of buyer education by eBay. Our case is a classic example of why the DSR system is fundamentally flawed, and why DSRs should not be used to impact the financials of any seller. But eBay have determined it is the best thing since sliced bread and will be persevered with, even if it means eBay ends up with no sellers at all. The stockholders/shareholders should be screaming for management heads on platters, because the marketplace is being crucified and destroyed, and so will the share dividends and price be, the longer this system remains in place. In response to massive criticism from sellers, about the absolute unfairness of the DSR system, eBay responded here - http://forums.ebay.com/db2/thread.jspa?threadID=2000509099&start=69 "Starting in March we will be asking buyers for more information if they leave a poor shipping DSR score (a 1, 2 or 3). Over time that data will help us provide more information on what may be contributing to low DSR scores." They failed to state over how much time, and gave no indication of recognition that during that time, many sellers could have their eBay businesses wrecked. At post number 6 of that workshop, seller lil.stuff asked, "QUESTION: If eBay truly believes that "people are basically good", why are 4 out of 5 stars considered to be a low rating, punishable by a warning message on your listings, and lower search visibility with the Best Match feature, when 3 stars is apparently average according to eBay's own DSR standards?" Throughout the six pages and 163 posted messages of the workshop, other sellers joined in demanding an answer to that question. Eventually, at post #133, the answer was, "...an interesting question about buyers who leave a “4” to indicate reasonable shipping. The DSR scores are helpful as a relative measure of how a seller is doing compared to other sellers in their category, and having some spread in the scores is helpful. Today 50% of sellers are averaging a 4.6 on their shipping cost or greater. Sellers with a 4.0 DSR or lower on their shipping cost represent the bottom 1% of sellers." which I am sure everyone can recognise as being not an answer, but an avoidance of the core issue, in the style we are all used to from seller support. One of the great posts in that workshop came at #148, seller "xcergy" said, "I started putting the paid and ship date in my feedback. If buyers want to leave low scores for shipping time... give them to USPS and UPS and the other carriers... not the eBay sellers who ship next day." I like that idea - imagine if all sellers began leaving feedback comments such as - "Paid 01 Mar 08 for 7 week delivery, Shipped 2 Mar 08", then on 22 Mar the buyer leaves a feedback comment such as "Slow delivery from overseas seller" together with a neutral or negative rating - guess which user then looks like a total pratt? I wonder how eBay support would handle an ensuing complaint from the seller regarding hostile bidding? At the end of the workshop, the eBay staff running it made the following concessions -
On that last point, I've heard from a number of sellers of digital download products (instant electronic delivery after payment online) that despite their items having genuine free delivery, and the delivery time being absolutely in the buyers hands (i.e. the buyer chooses when to download and receive the item), those sellers still cannot get their delivery time above a 4.8 across the whole group, and some of them have delivery time ratings in the 3.x range. If eBay had any doubt about the validity of the DSR system, surely that is concrete evidence? Even sellers who only sell with "buyer collects" delivery (i.e. they do not despatch anything, ever) are complaining there despatch DSR is less than a perfect 5.0 - perfectly illustrating that even when the exact time for obtaining the goods is 100% in the buyers' hands, there are some who simply will not give a seller the justified 5.0 rating. So finally, we come to the point of this blog post... If you are a buyer on eBay, you have a responsibility to your sellers, as well as to other buyers and to yourself. You must learn both sides of the feedback story - the seller's side, and the buyer's side. If you have no genuine reason to complain about a transaction, don't just automatically go for a 3.0 because "it must be the average" or for a 4.0 because "it was above average but not outstanding", if you don't give the seller a 5.0 then that seller may no longer be available to you if you have a potential claim under the product warranty six months after you purchase. Giving seller's 5.0's if there is no genuine problem, is not cooking the system, it is ensuring the seller is around long enough to supply you again, and to take care of any later issues under warrany, or guarantee, on your purchase. Help your sellers to help you - keep them on eBay, keep them profitable. Gaz UPDATE 31 Aug 2008 - In the original announcements discussed above, eBay US said if a Seller had any one DSR below 4.0 they would suffer selling restrictions. Now (late Aug 2008) they are saying that any one DSR below 4.3 will result in them not being allowed to sell on eBay until that DSR climbs above 4.3 again. But they are still telling Buyers that a rating of 4.0 is Good / Satisfactory etc.
|